A Youth Criminal Justice Court judge has held that paralegals cannot represent clients in that court.
Justice M. L. Cohen found, in a decision released Feb. 23, that the special court lies outside the paralegal scope of practice. A paralegal had asked to be declared a “suitable adult” to assist a young person, under section 25 (7) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Justice Cohen found that, based on the paralegal’s conduct, he was not a “suitable adult” under that provision.
Justice Cohen went further, providing extensive reasons for his decision.
~ Justice Cohen
After reviewing the LSUC By-laws and related legislation, Justice Cohen found that paralegals may only represent a party in the case of a proceeding under the Criminal Code before a summary conviction court.
Proceedings in the Youth Justice Court are not proceedings under the Criminal Code. They are proceedings under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) and the Youth Justice Court has exclusive jurisdiction. Provisions include separate legal and sentencing regimes for young people. “The criminal justice system for young persons today is “completely sealed off” from the adult system, with separate courts, judges and rules,” Justice Cohen noted. He added that only counsel may represent youth. Paralegals are not counsel. Paralegals provide legal services, rather than practice law, under the Law Society Act.
Adult ‘Assistance’ Inadequate When Stakes are High
Under the YCJA, the court has discretion to allow a “suitable adult” to provide assistance, but not representation. Suitable adults’ assistance is limited and “profoundly inferior” to counsel, Justice Cohen wrote. “If assistance is treated as the equivalent of representation in the youth context, there is no doubt that, over time, the statutory scheme intended to protect the rights of young people will be eroded.”
In discussing his reasons for the suitable-adult finding, His Honour notes that the paralegal in this case was not aware of, and had not advised his client of, provisions under the Act that provide for counsel to be appointed when Legal Aid is not available. “This speaks to an absence of knowledge of the YCJA generally.”
Justice Cohen also found that it was “unacceptable” for confidential documents to have been released to the paralegal, in pre-trial steps. “A paralegal cannot circumvent the restrictions on his/her licence by asking to be found to be a suitable adult. On this reasoning alone, a paralegal cannot be a suitable person. Permitting a paralegal to provide assistance would be inconsistent with the proper administration of justice in the Youth Justice Court.”