Legal Word of the Day: “Wilful Blindness”

See No Evil

See No Evil

“Wilful Blindness” — Deliberate avoidance of knowledge of a crime, especially by failing to make a reasonable inquiry.

The wilful blindness doctrine creates an inference of knowledge of the crime in question. Mens rea, or a mental element in a criminal offence, must be proved. This can include where an accused committed a prohibited act not with intent or recklessness, but with wilful blindness, or “contrived ignorance.”

Mr. Justice Sopinka defined the analysis: “A finding of wilful blindness involves an affirmative answer to the question: Did the accused shut his eyes because he knew or strongly suspected that looking would fix him with knowledge?”

Wilful blindess in action:

R. v. Briscoe, 2010 SCC 13 (CanLII), [2010] 1 SCR 411
Wilful blindness can substitute for actual knowledge whenever knowledge is a component of the mens rea.

R. v. Filice, 2011 ONCJ 833 (CanLII)
A paralegal argues two HTA cases.

B010 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)/em><, 2012 FC 569 (CanLII)
Refugee or people smuggler?

R. v. Smith, 2008 ONCA 101 (CanLII)
Did the judge say fifty or fifteen metres?

Got something to say, add, clarify or retract? Leave a Reply